Delaware Mortgage Loan Modification Service Provider Bond

SB 42 bill pending would require mortgage loan modification service providers (service provider) to register and post a $100,000 surety bond. The bond would run to the State for the benefit of the Attorney General and any consumer suffering damages as a result of the service provider s wrongful act, omission, default, fraud or misrepresentation committed in the course of business.

0 Comments

Connecticut Mortgage Broker Bond

SB 1110 would revise the existing licensing laws for mortgage lenders, brokers and originators. Existing law requires a minimum $40,000 surety bond. The law requires the bond amount to reflect the licensee’s loan origination volume and is to be set by regulations. Instead, the bill would require mortgage lenders and correspondent mortgage lenders to post a minimum $100,000 surety bond mortgage brokers would have to post a minimum $50,000 bond. The initial bond would be for the licensee’s initial license for the main office. The licensee would have to obtain a bond that covers all loan originators that the licensee sponsors at all locations.

1 Comment

California Contractors LLC Business Licence Bond

SB 392 requires contractors organized as limited liability companies (LLCs) to post a $100,000 bond as a condition of an LLC business license. The bond is for the benefit of any employee damaged by his or her employer’s failure to pay wages, interest on wages or fringe benefits. Further, if the licensee is a party to a collective bargaining agreement, the bond must cover welfare fund contributions, pension fund contributions and apprentice program contributions. The new law exempts qualifying individuals from the contractor license bond requirements if the individual held a 10% membership interest in a limited liability partnership. Current law requires a surety bond in the amount of $12,500 for contractors.

Comments Off on California Contractors LLC Business Licence Bond

New Jersey Foreclosure Consultants Bond

AB 359 would regulate foreclosure consultants. The bill would require such consultants to post a surety bond in the amount that the Director of the Division of Consumer Affairs prescribed by regulations. Such consultants would not include banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions or other federally insured financial institutions or insurance companies. Also exempted would be those licensed under the “New Jersey Licensed Lenders Act,” and those licensed as a real estate broker, broker salesperson or salesperson. The bill now has passed the Assembly and has been sent to the Senate Commerce Committee.

Comments Off on New Jersey Foreclosure Consultants Bond

Ohio Debt Settlement Provider Bond

HB 549 would require debt adjustment service providers to be licensed and post a surety bond from a bonding or insurance company authorized to do business in the State. The bond would have to be in the amount that the Director of Commerce will determine based on the licensee’s financial condition, experience and risk to consumers, among other factors. The bond could not be less than $10,000 or more than $50,000. The bond would be concurrent with the license term. It would have to be for the exclusive benefit of an individual harmed by the licensee’s failure to comply with the law.

Comments Off on Ohio Debt Settlement Provider Bond

Connecticut Surety Bond Guarantee Program

SB 736 would establish a surety bond guarantee program to help small and minority contractors with bonding.

Comments Off on Connecticut Surety Bond Guarantee Program

Pennsylvania Surety Bond Guarantee Program

HB 83 reintroduces a state bond guarantee program bill that died for lack of funding last year. HB 83 would create the Surety Bond Guarantee Fund Program. The program would serve to enable disadvantaged businesses to bid competitively for certain Commonwealth contracts. The Surety Bond Guarantee Fund (Fund) would provide guarantees up to $1 million for any one small or disadvantaged business enterprise. To qualify for a guarantee, the bond would have to meet the following criteria: 1) the bond must be listed in the contract bonds section of “The Surety Association of America’s Manual Of Rules, Procedures and Classifications”; 2) the bond is required by the contract, invitation for bid or request for proposal; 3) the surety company issuing the bond must be listed on the U.S. Treasury Department’s Circular 570 as an acceptable company; and 4) the bond must meet any other requirements established in regulations. The bill also contains a provision that the bond must contain a provision allowing the bond to be cancelled with 30-days notice to the Department, or the bond will not qualify for a guarantee.

Comments Off on Pennsylvania Surety Bond Guarantee Program

Connecticut Motor Vehicle Dealer Bonds

New legislation would reduce the license bond required for used motor vehicle dealers from $50,000 to $20,000.

Comments Off on Connecticut Motor Vehicle Dealer Bonds

New York Debt Collection Agency Bond

New legislation was recently introduced that would require debt collection agencies to be licensed and post a surety bond, contract of indemnity, or an irrevocable letter of credit that must be payable to the people of New York. The bond amount would be based on the number of persons employed by the licensee. A $10,000 bond would be required for one to four employees; a $25,000 bond for five to nine employees; a $50,000 bond for 10 to 20 employees, and a $75,000 bond for 20 or more employees. The bond would secure the licensee’s compliance with the applicable law and the payment of all costs and penalties. The surety’s total liability would be limited to the face amount of the bond, regardless of the number or nature of claims made against the bond or the number of years the bond remained in force.

Comments Off on New York Debt Collection Agency Bond

US Government Hearing On Minority Contracting Issues

Last month, the Government Management, Organization and Procurement Subcommittee of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held a hearing on minority contracting issues. The Subcommittee discussed existing federal programs for minority-owned business enterprises (MBE) and disadvantaged business enterprises (DBE), as well as the challenges that these businesses have faced. The testimony featured one panel including the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce (MBDA), and representatives of minority and small business development divisions within the Departments of Transportation (DOT) and Defense (DOD) and the General Services Administration (GSA), and another panel of minority contractors.

The testimony of the federal agencies focused on what the agencies had done to help MBEs and DBEs and the continuing challenges the contractors face. Largely, the government witnesses focused on a lack of access to capital. David Hinson, National Director of the MBDA, which is an agency of the Commerce Department, noted that it is working on a surety bonding initiative with a goal of identifying $100 million in private capital through a public-private partnership and to grow to $1 billion over time.

The panel of minority contractors and legal experts included representatives from the Minority Business Enterprise Legal Defense Fund, Mid-Tier Advocacy, the Airport Minority Advisory Council (AMAC), the Associated General Contractors of America (AGC) and the Thelton E. Henderson Center for Social Justice at Berkeley Law. Most of these panelists stated that discrimination generally existed in all aspects of contracting, including contract formation, awards of contacts, bonding, insurance and credit.

Other key issues addressed during the panel of minority contractors were contract unbundling, multi-tier subcontractors counting toward small business participation goals, small business size standards and prompt pay requirements. In written testimony, the Minority Business Enterprise Legal Defense Fund noted that minority-owned construction firms were not able to meet bonding requirements, which constrained their participation in federal contracting opportunities. The written testimony stated that insurance brokers lack incentive to serve the minority construction firms, whose contracting opportunities are generally smaller in size.

Surety Bond Associates provides specialty surety bond services to small, minority and women owned contractors designed to eliminate the barriers that prevent them from accessing the financial resources necessary to actively compete.

Contact Us to learn more about our Surety Support Services

Comments Off on US Government Hearing On Minority Contracting Issues